<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Queer and The Fat Man - Movie Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://queerandthefatman.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://queerandthefatman.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 01:11:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Avengers &#8211; A Superhero Cornucopia</title>
		<link>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/05/08/the-avengers/</link>
		<comments>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/05/08/the-avengers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fat Man</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seen In Theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avengers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marvel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer blockbuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whedon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queerandthefatman.com/?p=1590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never have concussions been so critical to the fate of the earth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0848228/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1591" title="oh joss, take me joss." src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/avengers-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><a title="better than Citizen Kane, apparently" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0848228/" target="_blank">The Avengers</a> </em>(2012) &#8211; Never have concussions been so critical to the fate of the earth.</p>
<p><div class="wpcol-one-half">Queer says:</p>
<p>All the pieces come together to create this: <em>The Avengers</em>.  It&#8217;s the super hero equivalent of the best orgy imaginable with all the people you&#8217;ve ever had, or wanted to have sex with.  Except most people who waited in line for this thing probably don&#8217;t have sex.  But hold the phone!  It didn&#8217;t break Midnight release records, yet managed to Hulk Smash the prior #1 film opening of all time?  Maybe there is something to this thing&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be honest, and the evidence is sitting right here on <a title="Captain America: The First Avenger (2011) – Patriotism never cost so much." href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2011/07/28/captain-america-the-first-avenger-shields-up/">this very website</a>, I wasn&#8217;t sure what I&#8217;d think of the culmination of many years, many films done by different directors, would end up looking like.  I guess I imagined it as this sort of Pot Luck where everyone brings something to the table that is their best dish, but doesn&#8217;t sit well with what everyone else brought.  A+B+C+D doesn&#8217;t always equal ABCD I kept saying.  Well, I am here to unequivocally say that I was wrong.  I am no fan of super hero movies, I&#8217;m tired of them being beyond mined for Blockbusters year after year and yet <em>The Avengers</em> ended up being so satisfying in nearly every possible way.</p>
<p>The script was clever in reference to the episodic nature of comic books.  With so many characters to split screen time with, this thing is as lean as possible without feeling narrow.  We start with the return of Loki (more about him later), how he&#8217;s going to provide the Epic Problem for our heroes to overcome, and then its off to gather them.  Fortunately, we are done with the introductions.  We don&#8217;t have to waste any time explaining who Thor is, why Captain America is around, or what causes a scientist to go green when he&#8217;s angry. Nope, instead, we can mine these characters for deeper meaning, which makes their associations all the more interesting when they don&#8217;t necessarily get along.</p>
<p>Best yet, when things started to get too talky, there was action.  And when the action started to drift into mind numbing territory, we are back with some quick humor or heavy techno-babble to keep things interesting.  There was hardly a moment when The Avengers wasn&#8217;t giving me what I needed at the time, be it quirky insight from Iron Man, a derring-do dose from Captain America (a much better character this time around), or some straight up hotness from Thor.  Even previously minor characters like Hawk-Eye and Black Widow shine.  All under the watchful gaze of Nick Fury. Well, okay, also Joss Whedon who proved to me that he isn&#8217;t just for fanboys anymore.</p>
<p>So what keeps <em>The Avengers</em> from reaching the extremely lofty perfect grade? Loki.</p>
<p>What can I say?  I already was critical of his character in <em><a title="Thor (2011) – STOP! Hammer Time!" href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2011/05/08/thor-hammers-it-home/">Thor</a></em>, and things just haven&#8217;t evolved one bit for Tom Hiddleston.  What&#8217;s his freakin&#8217; deal man?  Sure, he laughs contemptuously, and does all the wily wicked things a trickster should do (including sniveling and whimpering when the time is right) but where every other character on screen is portrayed boldly, he wilts.  Robert Downey Jr. practically OWNS his role.  Even the new Hulk, Mark Ruffalo, takes his version to new places that end up being better than what we&#8217;ve seen on the big screen before.  So why can&#8217;t the villain, who is exceptionally weak, not make more of an impact?</p>
<p>One more thing I kind of dread.  While I admit to fully enjoying what ended up happening with <em>The Avengers</em>, I&#8217;d warn the studio not to stretch this into overkill.  Sure, take your well deserved victory lap.  Heck, introduce some more characters and tie them together for some hopefully as well produced spin-offs and sequels.  But let&#8217;s not go crazy here.  Sure, everyone loves it when the well loved Nintendo gang are gathered up for a Mario Party, but they&#8217;re less likely to feel the same way about Mario Party 9.</p>
<p><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/queeraarrow.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-1609" title="queeraarrow" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/queeraarrow-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></div> <div class="wpcol-one-half wpcol-last">The Fat Man says:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a little reluctant to write this review.  <em>The Avengers</em>, as I viewed it, is just another big budget action flick.  All flash, no substance.  But to many, it&#8217;s the culmination of life-long dreams of seeing their favorite comic book heroes come to life on the big screen and kick some butt.  I try to respect that, but at the same time, I don&#8217;t give film makers a pass&#8230; not even the Nerd King himself, Joss Whedon.  Here we go &#8211; review, assemble!</p>
<p><em>The Avengers</em> follows the general story-line of most superhero movies &#8211; big villain mounts an attack on the city or earth, invincible heroes take on beatable monsters with the cunning use of brute force.  In this particular instance, we get an army of lizard somethings helped along by Thor&#8217;s angry not-brother Loki.  When the threat rises, the Avengers finally assemble and beat back the threat, saving the day and ensuring many sequels to come.</p>
<p>Like most movies I see, I have very little connection to the source material &#8211; unless you consider the half-dozen or so movies hammered out (THOR JOKE LOL!) in order to set up the BIG ONE.  I&#8217;ve seen them all, including Ang Lee&#8217;s <em>Hulk</em> that we all pretend didn&#8217;t happen &#8211; but it did.  It&#8217;s canon and you&#8217;re stuck with it.  Those movies set up the complex characters and emotional struggles that keep them from truly uniting against evil.  Thor&#8217;s got daddy issues, Stark is an egomaniac, and Captain America &#8211; SPOILER &#8211; is stranded in the future knowing his love ones are all long dead.  Heavy stuff.</p>
<p>Set aside the crazy action and dazzling CGI &#8211; you can get that in just about any action movie these days.  Even my most hated of films still had a &#8220;wow, they can do that now?&#8221; moment.  I will give you that <em>The Avengers</em> was incredible visually and didn&#8217;t skimp in the wow department.  Where I really found it lacking was the character department.  Despite the meticulous path that allowed Whedon to explore deeper emotions, he reduced every character to almost a spoof of themselves.  Stark&#8217;s fat head hogs every bit of screen time in a way that really didn&#8217;t do anything for story besides keeping things moving with one-liners.  Thor was portrayed as an epic god with the strange, strict discipline of a period piece player at ren-fest.  And we have Captain America, stranger in a future land, who is the idea of AMERICA ROCKS embodied with irrationally strong patriotism and an unsettling lack of emotion.  In the 3D post-conversion process, they forgot to bring the characters out of their 2D shells.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the honest truth about Whedon that you don&#8217;t want to hear:  he&#8217;s a TV writer, he&#8217;s a TV director.  He writes a great story arc, great plot movement, but never quite gets characters beyond their purpose of moving his story forward.  As far as his directing, he&#8217;s got the ability to point a camera at action and dialog, but doesn&#8217;t know how to move a camera or observe advanced film making grammar.  His shots are static and centered, instead of moving with the action, emotions, and power struggles on screen.  As I write this, <em>Iron Man 2 </em> is playing in the background.  In the opening scenes, we had a POV from Stark, an intense hard-cut scene of Whiplash&#8217;s grief-motivated fabrication, and a host of intentionally off-centered shots throughout the key Congressional hearings.  Favreau knows how to move a camera.  I wish I could have seen a least a fraction of this style in <em>The Avengers</em>.  I&#8217;ll rattle off a few more complaints:  weak sound design with frumpy clothing foley and stock whooshes and roars, monsters that could have been beaten by the army had they bothered to make an appearance, a huge plot device founded on a random concussion, and a complete lack of rules with regards to the strengths and weaknesses of the characters.  That last one is the big interest I have in super-heroes.  Sure you&#8217;re massively strong, but what can beat you?  The Hulk, Thor, Cap Am, and even Iron Man&#8217;s suit seem to lack any weaknesses at all during the long-fought battle.  You can&#8217;t have peril if there&#8217;s no opportunity.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve made it this far, dear dear fans, let me hug you with my warm words and soft, inviting fat body.  MMM..  don&#8217;t you feel better?  Whedon&#8217;s TV shows are GREAT&#8230;let&#8217;s just all agree to keep him away from the big screen.  And here&#8217;s what I liked about <em>The Avengers</em>:  I thought Mark Ruffalo played the deepest character in the film and was the best Bruce Banner to date.  His nervous calm revealed a rage-filled insanity that embodies The Hulk.  He was a joy and I can&#8217;t WAIT to see more Hulk movies.  A lot of the fun moments and jokes (&#8220;I get that one.. I get that reference&#8221;) keep the mood light in what could have been a movie taking itself far too seriously.  All in all, a very fun movie to watch.  I sucked down a $7 giant coke slushy and didn&#8217;t feel bored for a moment.  That&#8217;s (unfortunately) an accomplishment these days.</p>
<p><em>The Avengers</em> could have been so much more.  It was fun, sure, but it lacked any of the depth that we saw out of the characters in previous films and didn&#8217;t deliver a truly daunting villain.  The Avengers finally got together, but it happened in an &#8220;okay, guess we&#8217;re in this movie together and should, ida know, fight stuff&#8221; kind of way.</p>
<p><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/fatmanb.png"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-1594" title="fatmanb" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/fatmanb-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
</div><div class="wpcol-divider"></div></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/05/08/the-avengers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Three Stooges &#8212; Slap Schtick</title>
		<link>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/04/29/the-three-stooges-slap-schtick/</link>
		<comments>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/04/29/the-three-stooges-slap-schtick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 01:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seen In Theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nostalgia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queerandthefatman.com/?p=1580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Larry, Curly, and Moe-No!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0383010/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1581" title="The Three Amigos of Comedy" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/l_383010_d65e9fa7-192x300.jpg" alt="" width="192" height="300" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><a title="It's technically a hit. Lots of them, really." href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0383010/" target="_blank">The Three Stooges</a></em> (2012) &#8211; Larry, Curly, and Moe-No!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><div class="wpcol-one-half">Queer says:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Once upon a time, this Farrelly brother project was supposed to have big name stars.  Thankfully, that never worked out.  If it had, not only would it have probably become a rough spot on some careers, it would have distracted from the characters themselves.  The folks that we ended up getting are no names, and really let you focus on their impressions of the iconic comedy troupe <em>The Three Stooges</em>.  That&#8217;s the good news.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The bad news is, other than presenting the slap stick version of ha-ha, there isn&#8217;t much else for them to do here.  While the movie is cut up into effectively three episodes, they are all interconnected and are basically the standard three-acts of any properly told story.  The worst by far is unfortunately the beginning.  We&#8217;re introduced to the child versions of Larry, Curly, and Moe, three boys who are dropped off at an <a title="Adopt a cutie today." href="http://www.orphanage.org/" target="_blank">orphanage</a> and reek havoc on the nuns that run the place.  One day, the idea to try and pull one over on a couple to hopefully get rid of one of the dangerous trio kind of backfires, but sets into motion the rest of the story.  The kids can&#8217;t pull off impressions very well, and the whole start of this thing is hard to get moving.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Once we&#8217;re moving into the second, more meaty episode, things start to gel.  At least as far as remembering the nostalgic value of the piece.  Talking all over one another, slipping in puns in the midst of the hitting and eye-poking, we&#8217;re reminded of why this baseline comedy was all about.  <em>The Three Stooges</em> is just pure low-brow physical humor funny.  If you&#8217;ve had a bad day, an episode of this should make you just laugh and forget about things for a while.  And <a title="The original in amazing black and white." href="http://youtu.be/Hy4C3MSQAok" target="_blank">in fifteen minute doses</a>, it works.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">But now that things are stretched out to movie-length, there is an over arching story that just doesn&#8217;t pull through.  Worse, there isn&#8217;t anything more for the trio to do while on their quest to save the orphanage from financial ruin.  In fact, the methodology kind of gets rather dark as they&#8217;re hired to off someone, get separated, and somehow the emphatically non PG-rated <a title="This is the true story..." href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1563069/" target="_blank">Jersey Shore</a> people get involved.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I suppose it was meant as a metaphor.  That reality show hijinks are this generations version of the innocent brand of mischief of <em>The Three Stooges</em> of the past.  But I&#8217;m not sure if that&#8217;s necessarily correct.  While if you really took the slap stick as assault, you&#8217;d be overlooking the fact that deep down Larry, Curly, and Moe desperately needed one another.  And that&#8217;s not something I could probably say about the insipid version of humanity folks like J-Wow, The Situation, and Snookie represent.  And if thee wasn&#8217;t a deeper meaning in crossing these worlds, well then, all <em>The Three Stooges</em> has going for it is physical comedy, and that isn&#8217;t enough to hang a movie on. Even with the nostalgic factor.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/queercminus.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1582" title="queercminus" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/queercminus.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="150" /></a></div> <div class="wpcol-one-half wpcol-last">The Fat Guy says:</div><div class="wpcol-divider"></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/04/29/the-three-stooges-slap-schtick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cabin in the Woods &#8211; All Hail Lord Whedon</title>
		<link>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/04/19/the-cabin-in-the-woods-all-hail-lord-whedon/</link>
		<comments>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/04/19/the-cabin-in-the-woods-all-hail-lord-whedon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fat Man</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seen In Theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whedon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whedon-b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whedon-horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whedon-joy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whedon-killing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whedon-love]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queerandthefatman.com/?p=1571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Killing young folk in the woods never gets old.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1259521/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1572" title="it's in the woods, they say." src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/cabin-203x300.jpg" alt="" width="203" height="300" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><a title="Horror for the Buffy Fans" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1259521/" target="_blank">The Cabin in the Woods</a></em> (2012) &#8211; Killing young folk in the woods never gets old.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><div class="wpcol-one-half">Queer squeals:</div> <div class="wpcol-one-half wpcol-last">The Fat Man hollers:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Hype is a funny thing.  I especially love irrational hate-hype where there&#8217;s some poor movie singled out and hated regardless of anybody actually seeing it to judge for themselves.  This year already, <em>John Carter</em> was pretty well hated despite a decent box office.  Nobody else popping up on the radar, but there&#8217;s still plenty of time.  Hate-times.  Joss Whedon projects are the opposite rule &#8211; irrational love and adoration.  I chose the poster for this post that has instead of the Rubix™ Cube house design all of the praise heaped on this film.  Did it deserve it?  Let&#8217;s drive in to the reviewing woods for a brief visit.  Spoilers ahoy, I guess.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Film starts with a TV-actor studded typical &#8220;let&#8217;s go to the woods&#8221; college kids getting ready scene.  They&#8217;re all reasonably hot and claim to be amazingly well read, although their judgement later in the film doesn&#8217;t really point that direction.  They find themselves quickly trapped inside a horror world where someone or something is watching and allegedly manipulating the situation.  Not a whole lot to say without &#8220;ruining&#8221; the &#8220;most brilliant film of the last 600 years.&#8221;  The usual jump stuff, creepy moments, and blood-smeared cleavage.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">As movies go, pretty good!  I jumped a few times, felt a little on edge, and didn&#8217;t generally dislike the experience like I thought I mike.  It peppered in a decent bit of humor delivered quite well by the (for this movie) comedy duo of Richard Jenkins and Bradley Whitford.  Very reminiscent of 2006&#8242;s <em><a title="Slithering in to your heart" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0439815/" target="_blank">Slither</a></em> as sort of a B-movie spoof of itself.  Again, don&#8217;t really want to spoil, but there were some nicely entertaining moments similar to the great massacre scene at the end of <em><a title="breaking.. day?" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0433362/" target="_blank">Daybreakers</a></em> (an otherwise uneventful movie).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Did this movie redefine a genre?  Did it surprise with its twists and turns?  Did it even deviate from the very spoilerific <a title="SPOILERS.  IN THE TRAILER." href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXfc12BqFkc" target="_blank">trailer</a>?  Not so much.  Let&#8217;s see, trailer says:  kids load in to RV, head in to area covered by death grid.  There&#8217;s cameras everywhere as well as horrible things to do killing.  It even tells you who survives.  That&#8217;s weak sauce on a weak burger (side of strong fries)!  The <em>why</em> is left unanswered, but does it really matter if you&#8217;re killing folks?  It didn&#8217;t have time to develop in to a &#8220;truly mind-bending experience&#8221; or give us much more than the horror equivalent of <em>Wrath of the Titans</em> &#8211; visual feast pushed along by cheap plot devices.  CITW could have used Bill Nighy, but what movie couldn&#8217;t benefit?  I&#8217;d like to write more about Mr. Nighy, but we have to talk about Joss Whedon some more.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Hyped up beyond all reasonable expectations?  Absolutely.  It&#8217;s a Whedon.  I wouldn&#8217;t expect his fans to act any other way.  It&#8217;s the rest of the media world that confuses me a bit.  Cabin in the Woods would have been a far more enjoyable film had I gone in with a media blackout ahead of time.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/fatmanbplus.png"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-1573" title="fatmanbplus" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/fatmanbplus-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="wpcol-divider"></div></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/04/19/the-cabin-in-the-woods-all-hail-lord-whedon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Titanic 3D &#8211; A Sinking Feeling it Doesn&#8217;t Add Anything</title>
		<link>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/04/09/titanic-3d-a-sinking-feeling-it-doesnt-add-anything/</link>
		<comments>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/04/09/titanic-3d-a-sinking-feeling-it-doesnt-add-anything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seen In Theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Winslet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonardo DeCaprio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rated pg-13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[re-release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrath of the Titans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queerandthefatman.com/?p=1557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Three Hour Ego Trip]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120338/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1558" title="&quot;I'll never let go, Audience.&quot; -- James Cameron" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/l_120338_dc5a2622-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><a title="At least the iceberg didn't have Coca-Cola bears." href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120338/" target="_blank">Titanic 3D</a></em> (2012) &#8211; A Three Hour Ego Trip</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><div class="wpcol-one-half">Queer says:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Re-releasing old classics with a shiny new coat of 3D paint has, for the most part, been Disney&#8217;s thing.  And it&#8217;s no wonder.  It must be a relatively simple process to dust off the print, separate the various color cells to make certain parts of the image pop, and go out and grab a fresh wad of cash on the project that&#8217;s more than paid for itself over the decades.  It&#8217;s something that James Cameron isn&#8217;t fond of, this converting to 3D business.  Yet, here he is, the master of the newfangled Hollywood plaything, doing it to one of his classics.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Too bad it adds virtually nothing to the experience.  And worse, it actually can be quite distracting at times.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em>Titanic</em> is an amazing film.  Taking the ironic story about the boat that could not sink and filming just that would have been more than enough to wow audiences.  But set inside are a plethora of sub-stories, the largest of which is the overriding narrative between cross-class lovers Jack and Rose.  There are so many nuanced characters surrounding them, you almost forget until the fateful moment the iceberg is struck that, oh yeah, this ship is gonna sink and most of them are going to die.  Everything takes a long time to both set up and finish, however, so it does have a viciously long running time.  I&#8217;m rather surprised that Cameron didn&#8217;t try to shave a scene or two to help rake in more cash while he was at it.  Especially lengthy is the beginning, where we&#8217;re introduced to the wreckage, its looters, and the old lady version of Rose.  But then again, by not altering the original (including the language that I&#8217;d forgotten about) he also didn&#8217;t go all George Lucas on us.  There are no digitally added sea monsters, nor does Jack shoot Cal first.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Instead, what effects the 3D face lift bring, are columns that stick out, groups of people during crowded scenes, and various railings or smoke stacks, or that sort of thing.  It&#8217;s a very minor alteration for the most part that proves to be just a distraction from the storytelling mastery that was inherent in the original multi-Oscar winning work.  When you&#8217;re sinking a huge set piece with hundreds of stunt performing extras, do you really need anything more?  No, you really don&#8217;t.  And while it&#8217;s kind of neat that while Rose is hanging off the back of the vessel, it really does now look a long way down&#8230; it&#8217;s not worth the extra price in admission, nor the sacrifice of neglecting the story while looking for moments to justify the rework.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Essentially, <em>Titanic 3D</em> is just unnecessary and does the industry as much disservice as the <em>Clash of the Titans</em> conversion Cameron <a title="They parked a dump truck full of money at his house!" href="http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2010/03/james-cameron-says-clash-of-the-titans-sucks" target="_blank">spoke so vehemently against</a>. My grade reflects this, and should not be misunderstood for my grade for the original version of <em>Titanic</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/queercnavi.jpg"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-1559" title="queercnavi" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/queercnavi.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></div> <div class="wpcol-one-half wpcol-last">The Fat Man says:</div><div class="wpcol-divider"></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/04/09/titanic-3d-a-sinking-feeling-it-doesnt-add-anything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QaTFM.com Turns 1</title>
		<link>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/04/01/qatfm-com-turns-1/</link>
		<comments>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/04/01/qatfm-com-turns-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 18:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queerandthefatman.com/?p=1547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A short retrospective look at our first year out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/bdaycake.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1548" title="bdaycake" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/bdaycake-285x300.jpg" alt="" width="285" height="300" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Queer and The Fat Man Dual Movie Review Site Turns One</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><div class="wpcol-one-half">Queer Says:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Here we are, one year later&#8230; one year older, and for the most part, one year wiser.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I really wasn&#8217;t sure that this website would work out.  Sure, I&#8217;d done this exact same thing years ago with a different Fat Man, but that was back when blogging was cool, and there weren&#8217;t nearly as many independent movie reviewers out there telling you what you should and shouldn&#8217;t go see.  Additionally, going to the theater was a lot more popular since things like Netflix, Roku, Hulu, and all that jazz either weren&#8217;t even in existence, or were just starting out.  Wait for the mail to send you a movie That will take forever!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Even when we got a month or two behind us, I wasn&#8217;t sure this website would work out.  Just take a look at what we ended up watching right away: <em><a title="Sucker Punch (2011) - Zack Snyder's latest opus is as usual more dazzle less razzle." href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2011/03/26/sucker-punch-welcome-to-movie-reviewing-suckers/">Sucker Punch</a></em>?  <em><a title="Insidious (2011) - The only thing worse than being lost, is being lost in a James Wan movie." href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2011/04/02/insidious-adj-crafty-sneaky-devious/">Insidious</a></em>? It was any wonder we didn&#8217;t hang ourselves almost immediately.  Fortunately, some good movies eventually came out.  Especially in that rare world of serious adult science fiction.  And we also eventually decided we shouldn&#8217;t force ourselves to see movies we had absolutely no interest in seeing.  That got me out of <em>Human Centipede 2</em>, something I&#8217;m eternally grateful for.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">And then we started to relax a bit on the &#8220;dual&#8221; nature of our reviews.  While a clever concept, it&#8217;s not always viable for both of us to see every movie.  Especially since now The Fat Man lives in a different part of the country.  Besides, would he really want to see the <a title="Tomboy (2011) - Clothes do not make the man." href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/01/30/tomboy-no-gurlz-allowed/">indie film about a girl who believes he is a boy</a>?  Nor am I ever excited about the latest <a title="Drive Angry (2011) - Fast, Furious, and Far Fetched" href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2011/06/02/drive-angry-and-screw-turn-signals/">Nick Cage flick</a>.  We thought by occasionally going our own way, we&#8217;d be saving ourselves from burn out and getting more reviews in your hands.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">So, you already know what my favorite films I&#8217;ve reviewed are.  We covered that in our Top 5 for 2011 for the most part.  But here are a couple of my favorite reviews I have written.  I hope you enjoy a quick look back, and will continue to enjoy our humble little site over the course of the next year.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a title="Source Code (2011) - Jake Gyllenhaal has 8 minutes to save Chicago." href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2011/04/03/source-code-youll-have-8-minutes-to-read-the-reviews/">Source Code</a>, where I try too hard to be clever by writing my review in the style of the film itself.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a title="Green Lantern (2011) - Takes all the willpower in the universe to endure." href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2011/06/20/green-lantern-powered-by-self-loathing/">Green Lantern</a>, where I completely lose my cool and flick off the filmmakers.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a title="The Three Musketeers (2011) - All for one, and almost all for naught" href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2011/10/23/the-three-musketeers-a-renn-faire-good-time/">The Three Musketeers</a>, where I review a film that no one saw, nor cared about.</div> <div class="wpcol-one-half wpcol-last">The Fat Man says:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">A year!?  I&#8217;m gonna puke happy all over the place!  I, like Queer, wasn&#8217;t sure if we&#8217;d make it a year.  I do like writing but it ebbs and flows a bit, as you can see by some of our slow periods.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">We did make it, no help from the movie industry.  I think more than ever, going to the movies just isn&#8217;t as fun as it was even 5 years ago.  I can count on one hand the movies I&#8217;m excited about seeing this year (Prometheus, The Hobbit, Brave&#8230; uh&#8230; ) and I have not seen a lot of great coming from the indie side of the world either (<a title="Tomboy – No Gurlz Allowed" href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/01/30/tomboy-no-gurlz-allowed/">other than boys thinking they&#8217;re french girls or something</a>).  Add to that the audience aspect that tends to ruin just about every film.  EVERYBODY has a cell phone and feels the need to have it tethered to their body.  Even the little middle-school kidlins that are supposed to be there to have a good time with their friends can&#8217;t stop texting and having unrelated conversations.  I&#8217;ll pay buckets to the first theater to ban cell phones and anybody under 21.  Woo!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">But I have enough bitter ranting in my reviews.  I still really enjoy going to the movies.  I like seeing the big screen, the previews, the usually quite loud sound systems.  I&#8217;m not going to stop going any time soon because I still have magical experiences on a semi-regular basis.  And I have to say I really enjoy this site.  I enjoy when we get the occasional drive-by comment.  I enjoy Queer&#8217;s weird and sometimes incorrect points of view.  I think I get as much out of writing these reviews and reading Queer&#8217;s as anybody would just reading the site.  I&#8217;ve started to think about films from a critical standpoint and really analyze what I like and don&#8217;t like from a logical viewpoint.  It&#8217;s nice to take a hobby and suck the fun out of it with analytics.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Here are a few of my favorite reviews from the past year:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a title="Insidious – Adj.:  Crafty, Sneaky, Devious" href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2011/04/02/insidious-adj-crafty-sneaky-devious/">Insidious</a> - in which I envision what it&#8217;s like being inside James Wan&#8217;s head.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a title="Anonymous – Is Roland Emmerich a Hack?" href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2011/11/11/anonymous-is-roland-emmerich-a-hack/">Anonymous</a> &#8211; in which I get tricked again by Roland Emmerich.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a title="The Darkest Hour – A Series of Unfortunate Choices" href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2011/12/27/the-darkest-hour-a-series-of-unfortunate-choices/">Darkest Hour</a> &#8211; in which I am baffled by the decisions made in one of the most hilarious sci-fi thrillers I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Thanks for reading, and have a great year AT the movies!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="wpcol-divider"></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/04/01/qatfm-com-turns-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hunger Games &#8211; This is real March Madness</title>
		<link>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/03/24/the-hunger-games-this-is-real-march-madness/</link>
		<comments>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/03/24/the-hunger-games-this-is-real-march-madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seen In Theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blockbuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[franchise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lionsgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[march]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rated pg-13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summit Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queerandthefatman.com/?p=1527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's time to start running!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><em><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/hungergames1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1539" title="This little light of mine, I'm gonna let it shine." src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/hungergames1-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="300" /></a><a title="The odds are actually never in your favor." href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1392170/" target="_blank">The Hunger Games</a></em> (2012) - A good old-fashioned blood bath.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><div class="wpcol-one-half">Tribute Qale says:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Welcome to the start of the Summer Blockbuster Season™.  Wait, you mean to tell me it&#8217;s only March?  Wow.  Um, well, okay, I can wing this.  You know, normally when I see the Lions Gate logo at the start of my motion picture experience, I&#8217;m already starting to look for things to later throw at the screen.  Them buying up Summit didn&#8217;t help matters, but what do we have here?  A movie about a dastardly Capitol that demands tribute of children to fight one another to the death as payment for an uprising?  Alright, I saw <em><a title="A very different version of The Hunger Games." href="http://www.battleroyalefilm.net/" target="_blank">Battle Royale</a></em>, so I&#8217;m so in!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Now, for those new to this website, know that I don&#8217;t review movies generally on a philosophical basis. I leave all that heady stuff to the plethera of other critics who think they can talk down to you people. Nope, I just call it like I see it.  I watch the movie, and tell you if I thought it was a well made film that hits all the right notes when it comes to characterization, visuals, plot&#8230; you know, all that good stuff that makes it worth your time and money.  So that&#8217;s how I&#8217;m approaching <em>The Hunger Games</em> as well.  Though I should add that I haven&#8217;t read the book.  Not that I really usually review movies based on their source materials.  Two different mediums require two different approaches.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">So how does this PG-13 rated film that&#8217;s really really really hitting it big with the younger set handle the touchy subject of kids killing kids?  Through brilliant use of handi-cam when the scenes of brutality are the strongest as well as treating the story with complete seriousness and respect.  In this grim vision of our future, the tributes are culled once a year during a drawing called <a title="I fear it." href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tpy_pYXSpPA" target="_blank">The Reaping</a>.  The boy and girl are then whisked away to the lavish Capitol to train for the Games, but are also primed for the audience that the pageantry brings.  It&#8217;s absolutely horrifying, and we haven&#8217;t even seen our first child murdered.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">What else makes this telling so effective?  It&#8217;s outstanding cast which includes relative newcomers in Jennifer Lawrence (who is basically asked to carry an entire fucking franchise on her shoulders) and established character actors like Stanley Tucci (who plays my favorite character, Caeser Flickerman.)  Also extremely noteworthy is Woody Harrelson who plays Haymitch, a former tribute who has won the games and becomes the mentor of the kids from District 12.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">And then there are the Games themselves. They start off immensely strong, and then back off to allow some suspense to build.  No, it&#8217;s not just clever to call what happens in the woods acts of Katniss and mouse, it&#8217;s what really happens!  And no matter how much disdain you might have held for the premise of the film, you&#8217;ll become invested in the fate of the two younglings fighting for their lives, if not much more.  It&#8217;s important to note here that I don&#8217;t think this whole love-triangle business is as drummed up as fans would like it to be.  It&#8217;s not Twilight.  <a title="Stop. You're embarrassing yourself." href="http://team-peeta.co.cc/" target="_blank">There are no Teams</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">So it becomes moderately disappointing when <em>The Hunger Games</em> abruptly comes to a quick conclusion.  After being extremely careful and deliberate about  world building, filmmaker Gary Ross (<em>Seabiscuit</em>) introduces out of nowhere these horrible CGI creatures that spoil the integrity of the project.  While I recognize that they were in the book, I can&#8217;t imagine they were implemented so horribly there.  They, along with a sort of quickly thrown together final confrontation, really pulled me out of the thrilling action and drama.  It&#8217;s a shame, and not something I can completely overlook.  Even if I&#8217;m pretty excited to know what happens next.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I guess I am a little like a teenage girl.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/queeraarrow.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-1529" title="I used to hate The Hunger Games, then I took an arrow in the head." src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/queeraarrow-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></div> <div class="wpcol-one-half wpcol-last">Tribute The Fat Man says:</p>
<p>Ah, the rich.  They can really do what they want.  If they had their way, everything would be to the death &#8211; shopping for groceries, filling out your taxes, going to the bathroom &#8211; but we live in a civilized world that doesn&#8217;t quite let them get away with it unless you&#8217;re a Kennedy.  However, our friend Suzanne Collins gives us a chilling look in to the unchecked world where no middle class exists and teens are forced to slaughter each other on TV during <em>The Hunger Games</em>.</p>
<p>Katness Goodwithbow, played by the talented Jennifer Lawrence, is an inexplicably well-fed coal-miners daughter living in an impoverished District where starvation runs rampant.  Her little sister is picked for <em>The Hunger Games</em>, so Katness steps forward to participate in <em>The Hunger Games</em>.  As the participants from <em>The Hunger Games</em> arrive in the Capitol which is in the center of who knows where and go through a media parade before competing in <em>The Hunger Games</em>.  <em>The Hunger Games</em>.</p>
<p>Queer will get on me for being a little spoilerific during this review, but there&#8217;s a few minor spoilers that I need to cover in order to discuss its enormous shortcomings as a film.  Yes, I&#8217;ll get this out now &#8211; I did not like it.  And the more I think about it, the more I can&#8217;t stand this film.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll start with the unexplained.  Mrs. The Fat Man says there&#8217;s a lot more explained in the book, but it&#8217;s still shallow pulp.  What does the winner get?  They never mention.  That&#8217;s a huge incentive.  If they get to live, then whoop-de-doo, but if they get a plush lifestyle, then that&#8217;s worth fighting for especially if you&#8217;re in one of the poorer Districts.  What are the Districts?  We get a glimpse of a house and a courtyard in District 12, but that&#8217;s it on sightseeing.  Where are we?  I can tell we&#8217;re in North Carolina by the woods (and&#8230; the credits), but where in fictional real life are we supposed to be seeing this massive (I assume) area of land?  Why in the heck has that stupid pin been all over the posters, books, actual pins, bookmarks, billboards, cars, trucks, skywriting when she picks it up in a market days before <em>The Hunger Games</em> and it just happens to be around?  What was the point of sponsors if all you get is some balm and a tin of soup?  What cheapskate orders soup for someone fighting to the death?  So much was left unanswered without a hint to the viewers.</p>
<p>Katness herself showed a ton of promise, ripe with moral conflict, but never quite made it out of the shallow end.  She was conflicted about killing, refusing to participate, but when the time comes she rips in to her fellow humans like any of the degenerates in <em>The Hunger Games</em>.  Not a shred of remorse for any of her actions, just crying over some brief acquaintances that couldn&#8217;t cut it in the tough world of fighting to the death.  I think we can characterize most of the film as distant emotionally.  There&#8217;s some crying, some yelling, confusion, awkward infatuation that is most certainly not love, but none of it ever comes across as particularly genuine.  Maybe it&#8217;s acting, but I think it&#8217;s mostly the script.  Example:  there&#8217;s an early scene of complete chaos and death.  It was horrifying and should have been a deeply disturbing.  I wanted to empathize with anyone&#8230;well, not the rude craps that seem to wander in to movie theaters these days &#8211; I want nothing in common other than location.  That leaves me with finding a character that should be deeply effected &#8211; Katness will do.</p>
<p>She didn&#8217;t care.  Just a mouth open stare, and then runs off.  Nothing at all.  How are we supposed to relate to a character that can witness that sort of animal behavior and just shrug it off?  Again, this is all story related and not really a mark on acting when characters don&#8217;t have the dialog or time to appear human.</p>
<p>I like Jennifer Lawrence.  She&#8217;s not a typical rail-skinny actress and has some real talent acting.  However, she got shot ugly all over this film.  Profile, from below &#8211; not her best angles and the primary ones used.  For shame.  The action sequences were absurdly shaky and felt completely unplanned.  Suprise surprise when I see Steven Soderbergh&#8217;s name sprinkled all throughout the credits.  Like the acting, nothing on the technical side makes me want to come back to this film or really continue with the series.  Can the films improve over time like a fine block of Velveeta?  Only if there&#8217;s chips and taco beef, whatever those mean in filmmaking.</p>
<p><em>The Hunger Game</em>s felt like it was shot in a hat, both in story and style.  I&#8217;m not impressed, but I&#8217;m also not a teenage girl.</p>
<p><span style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/fatmanc-150x1501.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1537 alignnone" title="fatmanc" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/fatmanc-150x1501.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></span><span style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="wpcol-divider"></div></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/03/24/the-hunger-games-this-is-real-march-madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21 Jump Street &#8211; Puts the Narc in Snark</title>
		<link>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/03/22/21-jump-street-puts-the-narc-in-snark/</link>
		<comments>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/03/22/21-jump-street-puts-the-narc-in-snark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 21:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seen In Theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[80s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay jokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnny depp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jonah hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rated r]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queerandthefatman.com/?p=1509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terrible cops kick it old school.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1232829/"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1510" title="All dressed up and nowhere to blow." src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/l_1232829_85ac2bdc-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="300" /></a><em><a title="Too cool for school." href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1232829/" target="_blank">21 Jump Street</a></em> (2012) &#8211; Terrible cops kick it old school.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><div class="wpcol-one-half">Queer says:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Let&#8217;s get this out of the way first: <em>21 Jump Street</em> isn&#8217;t a straight up spoof, but really doesn&#8217;t take itself seriously at all.  Nor does it have much in common with the 80&#8242;s television series by the same name.  But what it does have going for it is lots of laughs, a surprisingly healthy dose of action, and Channing Tatum looking all hot and shit.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">A lot of people don&#8217;t want to go see comedies in theatres.  It&#8217;s expensive to go out, and the movie will probably be just as funny when it comes out on DVD in a few months, right?  Well, maybe.  See, there is also the idea that seeing a comedy in a collective, things you might not laugh at alone, when spurred by others laughing, you might just find yourself having a better time than you expected.  This is probably how <em>The Hangover 2</em> worked, or rather <a title="What a bankrupt movie that was." href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2011/05/28/the-hangover-part-ii-bangkok-dangerous/">didn&#8217;t work as far as I am concerned</a>.  Fortunately, <em>21 Jump Street</em> is just plain funny on its own.  Putting quick talker Jonah Hill up against handsome and dumb Channing Tatum and sending them both back to high school as undercover officers is brilliant.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">They&#8217;re there to check out the local dope show, and find out how to score the newest synthetic drug.  Hilarity ensues.  But not at first.  See, when the film starts up, its in <a title="Seriously." href="http://tryingtoohard.org/" target="_blank">Obviously Trying Too Hard Mode</a>™.  It&#8217;s not until they accidentally switch undercover identities, forcing them to take a different popularity path than they were best suited for back when they went to school the first time.  Situational comedy works so much better for this duo than rattling off one-liners any day of the week.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Eventually, after mining the drug itself for laughs, the losers decide to throw a party.  Of course.  And they end up going to prom.  Of course.  They even get to have a high speed car chase with multiple changes of vehicles.  Of course?  See, what&#8217;s so great about the last third of the movie, is things get SO out of control that even though the script is plowing through plot that we&#8217;ve seen hundreds of times in both teenage and buddy cop comedies, somehow combining them with a sort of knowing wink makes it worthwhile.  It helps that Jonah Hill has been hard at work making quality comedy films for quite sometime.  Channing Tatum? Well, he can just <a title="NO I'm his biggest fan!" href="http://channingtatumunwrapped.com/fans/fan-club/" target="_blank">stand there and look pretty</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">A surprise cameo (may not actually be a surprise at this point) during a surprisingly violent ending does serve well to put a cherry on top of this remarkable durable re-imagining of a pretty silly premised television show.  Even if it&#8217;s unnecessarily overly vulgar and abundant with the gay jokes.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/queerbepositive.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1511" title="queerbepositive" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/queerbepositive-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></div> <div class="wpcol-one-half wpcol-last">The Fat Man says:</div><div class="wpcol-divider"></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/03/22/21-jump-street-puts-the-narc-in-snark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Carter &#8211; Too Late for Antebellum Mars</title>
		<link>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/03/12/john-carter-too-late-for-antebellum-mars/</link>
		<comments>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/03/12/john-carter-too-late-for-antebellum-mars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fat Man</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seen In Theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew stanton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avatar 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[b]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not-animated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queerandthefatman.com/?p=1484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best steampunk movie since Wild Wild West.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0401729/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1485 aligncenter" title="from.. where??" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/johncarter-209x300.jpg" alt="" width="209" height="300" /></a><em><a title="JC of Mars.. Hmm.  " href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0401729/">John Carter</a></em> (2012) &#8211; Best steampunk movie since <em>Wild Wild West</em>.</p>
<p><div class="wpcol-one-half">Deja Queer says:</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the overwhelming problem that <em>John Carter</em> has to overcome:  The source material has been mined for movies repeatedly for generations.  So unless this version brings something new to the table, while watching it, you&#8217;re going to get a huge case of Déjà vu.  Fortunately, a crap ton of money has been poured into this Andrew Stanton (<em>WALL-E</em>) directed monstrosity and it really does show in the special effects.  Especially when watched in IMAX 3D.  This is something I rarely do, but since I had discount passes, I thought why not?  And as far as visuals go&#8230; (Taylor Kitsch has a pretty hot body, but no ass) it was worth the money.</p>
<p>With fantasy and sci-fi themes this well worn, these set pieces are astounding.  Every flying ship looks like <a title="Kupo!" href="http://www.finalfantasygirls.com/final-fantasy/top-three-most-memorable-final-fantasy-airships-of-all-time" target="_blank">something out of the most epic <em>Final Fantasy</em> video game</a>.  The four armed creatures are better than anything George Lucas could whip up and insert into his own version of the material in his plethora of re-releases.  Mars is full of radiant colors to clash brilliantly against the dingy desert, and everything pops in very well crafted three-dimensions.</p>
<p>Well, all except the characters.  They&#8217;re as flat and wooden as ever.  And considering the tone of the film swings wildly from sci-fi serious to cartoon hijinks, it seems far too much to ask of these barely known actors.  And it&#8217;s not like the writing is all that great either.  Deeply seeped in tradition, this sweeping epic gives its characters very little new to say.  And there was more than one scene within the first two-thirds of the film, where I openly said, &#8220;Really?&#8221; as if I were <a title="Really?" href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/13828/saturday-night-live-really-with-seth-and-amy" target="_blank">trapped on the set of <em>Saturday Night Live</em></a>.</p>
<p>However, as the storyline about a soldier zapped to Mars and is interjected into a three-way civil war progresses, things actually start to get better.  Cutesy side-kicks start to become bearable.  The film largely abandons the &#8220;Gee, whiz, I&#8217;m really on Mars?&#8221; routine and starts to really just go with the flow setting up epic battles that bring out the teenage boy in this movie reviewer.  And so eventually, even though John Carter isn&#8217;t a very appealing hero &#8212; he&#8217;s kind of a dick, really &#8212; you start to actually kind of feel like rooting for the guy.</p>
<p>Which brings me to the conclusion&#8230; masterfully done with a couple of last minute twists that I didn&#8217;t even realize were coming.  There&#8217;s a reason why this material has been used so often, it&#8217;s very nearly used up.  And yet, in spite of misspent time fooling around in the desert, or adding a lot of fluff around the saga, I found myself really kind of digging what the legendary Pixar animator has done with the thing.  Yeah, it&#8217;s well known he spent a lot of money, got total creative control, and has probably created one of the biggest bombs for Disney financially in some time.  But, the truth is, at its core, it&#8217;s pretty good.</p>
<p>But only if you&#8217;re willing to spend the extra money yourself to see it in IMAX 3D.</p>
<p><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/queerbminus2.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-1502" title="queerbminus2" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/queerbminus2-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></div> <div class="wpcol-one-half wpcol-last">Tars Fat Man says:</p>
<p>Once again, we get an animation director gone rogue in to the live action arena.  Who will enter alive??  <em>MI:4</em> raked in almost $30 million wide opening weekend and $670 million wordwide to date.  Dang, Andrew Stanton, you&#8217;ve got your work cut out!</p>
<p>Ashton Kutchar, in his best role since <em>Dude, Where&#8217;s My Car?</em>, plays the gritty ex-Confederate soldier who is on a search for gold.  Update&#8230; my editor has informed me that Taylor Kitsch, not Kutchar, starred in the movie.  Taylor Kitsch, in his best role since the <a title="yeah, that's him again. " href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSPYtlWxmho" target="_blank"><em>Battleship</em> trailer</a>, plays the gritty Virginia man who takes the mythical planet of Mars by storm.  Transported through a freak accident that left him radioactive and hulk-like, John Carter has to choose between continuing his disgusting search for riches on earth or letting go of the past and helping the Mars babe in need.  What will he do?  If you&#8217;ve seen ANY trailer, you probably know the answer.  I guess all we have to wonder is.. does he get the girl?</p>
<p>File this one under &#8220;Movies I Wanted to Love.&#8221;  Andrew Stanton directed one of my favorite movies of all time:  <em><a title="WALL-E – The Little Robot That Stole Your Black Heart" href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2011/03/30/wall-e-the-little-robot-that-stole-your-black-heart/" target="_blank">Wall-E</a>.  </em>Just like <em>MI:4</em>, I had outrageously high hopes for a film that most likely would not live up to the hype in my mind.  I think in my head is far worse than the internet, because I have zero different opinions to possibly shock me back to reality.</p>
<p><em>John Carter</em>&#8230; never read the books, so I can&#8217;t comment from that perspective.  Beautiful film, wonderful visuals, did a great great job of world building, something I love in cinema.  There was a little too much going on to truly build characters into believable beings, but they at least made an attempt to make John Carter seem like a man with a past, someone who actually had conflict about whether on not he wants to chill out as a Warrior God on Mars.  The visual aspects and beautiful scenery made you forget that Mars is up there, real, and a lifeless chunk in space.  Add to that some nice funny moments, and you&#8217;d think it was the perfect film.  Nicely done, Andrew.</p>
<p>The grade I&#8217;m giving maaaaaybe doesn&#8217;t really match the movie I described up above.  Here&#8217;s the problem:  it&#8217;s PG-13, but desperately wants to be a kids movie.  As a result, there were the smattering of goofy characters, wacky falls, and just insultingly stupid moments in an otherwise fun film.  It&#8217;s a violent struggle involving deceit, magic, and a whole lot of death.  Give it to me uncensored, Disney!  Stanton is capable of sprinkling in kid-friendly jokes and moments in to bleak, adult worlds, so I can&#8217;t really tell where the disconnect happened.  Too many cooks in the kitchen?  Not enough dangerously-close-to-JarJar characters to mold in to overpriced toys and Happy Meal stuffers?  Who will ever know.  I&#8217;m sure Andrew Stanton does, but in the interest of having a career, his lips are sealed.</p>
<p><em>John Carter </em>opened up to a disappointing $30 million, $100 million worldwide weekend.  It still finished #2 behind <a title="The Lorax — Shut your mustache!" href="http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/03/05/the-lorax-shut-your-mustache/" target="_blank">The Lorax</a>.  While that&#8217;s not exactly a flop, the $200+ million spent on making and marketing the film has yet to be recovered.  I guess animators should stick to what they know best.</p>
<p><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/fatmanbminus.png"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-1486" title="fatmanbminus" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/fatmanbminus-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
</div><div class="wpcol-divider"></div></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/03/12/john-carter-too-late-for-antebellum-mars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lorax &#8211; Shut your mustache!</title>
		<link>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/03/05/the-lorax-shut-your-mustache/</link>
		<comments>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/03/05/the-lorax-shut-your-mustache/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Seen In Theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betty White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[march]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[musical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pointless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queerandthefatman.com/?p=1473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't mess with fuzzy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/l_1482459_6de91db3.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1474" title="Guilt tripping kids since 1971." src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/l_1482459_6de91db3-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a><em><a title="Orange you glad I didn't make another joke here?" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1482459/" target="_blank">Dr. Seuss&#8217; The Lorax</a></em> (2012) &#8211; Don&#8217;t mess with fuzzy.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><div class="wpcol-one-half">Queer says:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em>The Lorax</em> is a parable about the risks of destroying the environment in the attempts to promote commercialism.  Unfortunately, this film is as hypocritical as one could be.  It is without question one of the most crassly commercialized products produced so far in 2012.  The movie has <a title="Who speaks for the target audience of the advertisers?" href="http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/05/10584075-lorax-promotions-try-to-balance-marketing-with-message" target="_blank">70 promotional tie-ins</a>.  And while they&#8217;re trying to balance that with the eco-friendly message of the film, they completely and utterly fail in my opinion.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Within the movie&#8217;s context, the grumpy mustached orange beast known as The Lorax (Danny DeVeto) is the guardian of the forest.  He appears to The Once-ler (Ed Helms) after the guy cuts down one tree.  Lorax says, hey don&#8217;t do that. And yet he and all of his fellow forest creatures all invite themselves into his home and enjoy all of the things he used the tree to make.  For a moment a deal is struck when the business is up and running that they aren&#8217;t going to cut down any more of the forest, but rather harvest what they need responsibly. Though this sequence is ruined as well by stereotyping southern rednecks.  Eventually, however, Big Business wins out,  along with Greed, and All That Bad Stuff and down come the rest of the woods.  Cute critters in peril pretty much dominate this section of the film.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Meanwhile, this is a story all told to a boy who lives in the city made of plastic who really just wants a tree to get laid.  In this world, there is a new Big Business selling plastic and air to everyone since the whole world is polluted because of how irresponsible environmentally The Once-ler was.  This part of <em>The Lorax</em> is also just as equally pretty mundane.  Nothing really stands out except a cute joke here and there, often in the background.  There is a nice meaty role for Betty White as the boy&#8217;s grandma, but by this point, I think even she&#8217;s been exploited enough, hasn&#8217;t she?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Look, I don&#8217;t want to be a cynical bastard.  I&#8217;m a left winger who normally would eat this eco-kid-flick up.  But it&#8217;s simply not a good movie.  The animation is passable, but Universal pales in comparison yet to the <a title="Dreamy" href="http://dreamworksanimation.com/" target="_blank">other</a> <a title="BRAVE!!!!" href="http://www.pixar.com/" target="_blank">names</a>.  It feels completely hypocritical to the core to hate on Big Business while being produced by a Huge Ass Media Conglomerate. The songs are some of the worst I&#8217;ve ever heard in a kid production. And other than telling people to &#8220;shut their mustache&#8221; I doubt you&#8217;ll even remember you saw the damn thing later on.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">My suggestion is to skip <em>The Lorax</em> and go hug a tree.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/queerdpluslorax.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1475" title="queerdpluslorax" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/queerdpluslorax.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></div> <div class="wpcol-one-half wpcol-last">The Fat Man speaks for the audience:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><em>The Lorax</em>, he speaks for the trees.  He speaks out against faceless, all-powerful corporations that rape the land and have no accountability.  He takes a passive approach using reason and pleading.  He loses in the end, but he&#8217;s spoken his mind, the evil Once-ler learns his lesson and spreads the truth (for 15 cents, a nail, and the shell of a great, great, great grandfather snail).  But that was back in the hopeful 70s.  We got a modern Lorax now, baby!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The new Lorax, voiced by the rasping Danny DeVito, is a wacky little creature that just wants to be friends with the Once-ler.  The Once-ler, no longer faceless, is a hopeful lad that wanted to make a useful product and got carried away.  Running side plots with villainous mayors and a kid looking for some snogging, the movie meanders through the ideas of <em>The Lorax</em> adding in a host of funny fun fun creatures for the kidlins.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I call this little thought &#8220;Missing the Point.&#8221;  I know the movie attempted to rail against plastics, industry, not planting trees, clean water, clean air, and the general stupidity of Southerners, but it missed the mark by a mile on actually sending a message.  Giving the Once-ler a face stripped away the overwhelmingly helpless feeling of fighting against corporations with no real head to cut off and created a single entity to hate.  It&#8217;s not that simple and Dr. Seuss knew that.  There&#8217;s more to a company than one person making bad decisions and intentionally ruining the countryside.  The other big big huge enormous massive point that the film glossed over in favor of a simple, happy Hollywood ending is the lifespan of the Truffula trees.  In the original piece, they take 10 years to germinate, 10 years to become a sampling (growing that nice fuzz), and 10 more to reach maturity and reproduce.  That&#8217;s a heck of a long time to wait for a tree to grow and over-harvesting could easily wipe it out.  In the NEW AND IMPROVED world of <em>The Lorax</em>, the trees take 30 minutes to germinate, 5 days to a sapling, and a few weeks top to reach full maturity and spray 10,000 little seeds all over the place.  With growth like that, it&#8217;s a wonder they managed to wipe out the trees at all &#8211; they&#8217;re more like weeds than anything.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Add to &#8220;Missing the Point&#8221; is &#8220;Poor Casting Strikes CGI Again.&#8221;  Every single voice was force fed in to a mis-matched body with even the dialog not quite matching the lip sync at times.  How do you manage that?  The only thing I can figure is the film was recorded and animated with competent voice actors, but the studio decided that the usually &#8220;let&#8217;s fill the poster with names&#8221; approach would DEFINITELY sound better.  I like Betty White and all, but that was just sad.  Hang it up, old woman.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Finally we have &#8220;Songs that Suck &#8211; a Tribute to John Powell.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t mind a few kids song in a movie, some of them are even fun (see <em><a title="Muppet or a Man" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WWWTW1P8rQ" target="_blank">The Muppets</a></em>), but this just made me hurt.  I wasn&#8217;t alone.  I had the pleasure of watching this movie with a theater packed to the brim with little kids.  Their reactions to the trailers made me the most happy I&#8217;ve been at the movies in a long long time, but once we got to the film a hush fell over the crowd.  Some even asked if they could leave.  It was tragic.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Read the book and avoid the film.  Books are still better for Gaia than getting an e-reader.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/fatmand.png"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-1518" title="fatmand" src="http://queerandthefatman.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/fatmand-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="wpcol-divider"></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://queerandthefatman.com/2012/03/05/the-lorax-shut-your-mustache/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

